HOUSE OF STUART 1603-1625 JAMES I (JAMES VI OF SCOTLAND) 1625-1649 CHARLES I FACTS: 1641 - Charles I's policies cause insurrection in Ulster and Civil War in England Oct 23: 50,000 Irish killed in an uprising in Ulster Charles I and the English Parliament acknowledge the Prebyterian Church in Scotland
1643 - Dec 13: Battle of Alton, A victory for Parliamentarians. Sir Richard Bolle killed in St Lawrence's church Solemn League and Covenant signed in Scotland
1649 - Jan 6: 'Rump' Parliament votes to put Charles I on trial Jan 30: King Charles I executed May 19: Commonwealth declared Dec 20: Theatres banned by Cromwell Christmas banned by Cromwell Cromwell's Irish campaign starts King Charles II proclaimed King of Scots and England in Scotland
James I, 1603-1625: Elizabeth was the last of the Tudor family. By birth, James Stuart, only son of Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, and great-grandson of Margaret, sister of Henry VIII, was the nearest heir to the crown. He was already King of Scotland under the title of James VI. He now, by act of Parliament, became James I of England. By his accession the two countries were united under one sovereign, but each retained its own Parliament, its own National Church, and its own laws. The new monarch found himself ruler over three kingdoms, each professing a different religion. Puritanism prevailed in Scotland, Catholicism in Ireland, Anglicanism or Episcopacy in England. On his coins and in his proclamations James styled himself King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland. But the term "Great Britain" did not properly come into use until somewhat more than a hundred years later, when, by an act of Parliament under Anne, Scotland and England were legally united. The English Parliament refused to grant free trade to Scotland and denied to the people of that country, even if born after James I came to the English throne (or "Post Nati," as they were called), the rights and privileges possessed by natives of England. Three chief events demand our attention in this reign. First, the increased power and determined attitude of the House of Commons. Secondly, the growth of the Puritan and Independent parties in religion. Thirdly, the establishment of permanent, self-governing colonies in Virginia and New England, destined in time to unite with others and become a new and independent nation,--the American Republic. Charles I--1625-1649: The doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, which had been so zealously put forth by James (S419), bore its full and fatal fruit in the career of his son. Unlike his father, Charles was by nature a gentleman. In his private and personal relations he was conscientious and irreproachable; in public matters he was exactly the reverse. This singular contrast--this double character, as it were--arose from the fact that, as a man, Charles felt himself bound by truth and honor, but, as a sovereign, he considered himself superior to such obligations. In all his dealings with the nation he seems to have acted on the principle that the people had no rights which kings were bound to respect. The whole of Charles I's reign must be regarded as a prolonged struggle between the King and the nation. Under the Tudors and James I the royal power had been growing more and more despotic, while at the same time the progress of the Protestant Reformation and of Puritanism had encouraged freedom of thought. Between these opposite forces a collision was inevitable, since religious liberty always favors political liberty. Had Charles known how to yield in time, or been sincere in the concessions which he did make, all might have gone well. His duplicity was his ruin. Though his death did not absolutely destroy the theory of the Divine Right of Kings, yet it gave it a blow from which it never recovered. |